The first thing that stands out about 2013 decisions from OCAHO is that there was a major uptick in the number of substantive decisions – 30, up from 11 in 2012. There were also eight decisions which involved Office of Special Counsel issues. Of the 30 substantive decisions concerning I-9 form violations, 29 of them involved the issue of the amount of penalties. One decision, Ketchikan Drywall Services, Inc., was the acceptance of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision affirming $173,250 in penalties. One of the most interesting points in these 28 decisions (discounting the Ketchikan case for the above reason) was the reduction in penalties assessed by OCAHO as compared with penalties actually sought by ICE. In 2012, OCAHO reduced penalties sought by ICE by an average of 45%, whereas in 2013, the average reduction increased to 46.5%. The primary reasons for the reductions were the poor financial conditions of the companies (20 decisions) and the court’s belief that the ICE penalties sought were “unduly punitive” on small employers (13 decisions). This was consistent with the 2012 OCAHO decisions, in which these were the two primary factors for reducing the penalties. On a few occasions, employers were successful in prevailing on legal issues, which ultimately caused OCAHO to dismiss these allegations. Due to the fact that employers are getting so much relief from OCAHO (an average reduction in penalties of 46.5%), it is anticipated more employers will be challenging ICE’s assessed penalties.
Hiring Tips Blog

What are the Form I-9 Penalty Trends from 2013 OCAHO Decisions?
Feb 1, 2014 | E-Verify Issues, Immigration Issues
Recent Posts
- U.S. District Judge Upholds Federal Preemption Over Minnesota State Drug Testing Law
- Mississippi: Indian Tribe Approves Referendum Regulating the “Possession, Production, and Distribution of Marijuana on Tribal Lands”
- Your Breath May Be Your Next ID: Study Says Nasal Patterns are as Unique as Fingerprints
- Robert Half Settles Background Check Suit for More than $2.2M
- Job Seeker Says Paycom Background Check Included Twin Brother’s Charges
Categories
- Background Check Compliance (102)
- Background Check Laws (59)
- Background Screening (43)
- Biometric Identification (4)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Credit Checks (32)
- Criminal History Check (180)
- Data Protection & Privacy (100)
- E-Verify Issues (74)
- Education Verification (7)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (48)
- Employer Negligence (36)
- Employment Screening (136)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (109)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (2)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (2)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (87)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (11)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (9)
- Occupational Fraud (11)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (186)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (20)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)