A job applicant has filed a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging SpartanNash rescinded her job offer after relying on a background check she was not allowed to review before the decision. The complaint claims the company violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by…
Posts by Category: Background Check Compliance
Applicant Alleges Lowe’s Pulled His Offer Over an Unseen Background Check
A job applicant has filed a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging Lowe’s rescinded his job offer after relying on a background check he was never allowed to review or dispute. The complaint claims the company violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to…
New Jersey Employers Now Face Private Lawsuits for Cannabis-Based Hiring Decisions
New Jersey employers face new legal exposure following a May 26, 2026 court decision allowing private lawsuits for cannabis-based hiring decisions. While pre-employment drug testing for cannabinoid metabolites remains permissible, employers must carefully evaluate…
A Dual Framework Emerges: Marijuana’s Schedule III Reclassification and the Road Ahead for Employers
The DOJ’s 2026 decision to move certain medical marijuana products to Schedule III has created a “dual framework” under federal law. While the change recognizes accepted medical uses for some cannabis products, recreational marijuana remains federally illegal….
Maine: State Enacts Law Protecting Medical Cannabis Patients from Workplace Discrimination
Maine has enacted a new law protecting medical cannabis patients from workplace discrimination, reinforcing job-related safeguards for registered users. The measure limits employers from taking adverse action against employees or applicants solely based on their…
When “Disclosure” Isn’t Enough: A California Court Expands Risk Under ICRAA
A recent California court decision is a strong reminder that compliance in the background screening space is not just about checking the box— it’s about getting every detail right. In an alert, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo highlights a case allowing…
California Court Allows Case to Move Forward Due to Background Check Form Technical Violation
The California Fourth Appellate District, Division One, recently held that an employee or job applicant does not need to prove actual harm beyond establishing a statutory violation to have standing under the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act…
California Finalizes Regulations on Automated Decision‑Making Technology
California has finalized regulations on automated decision-making technology (ADMT), strengthening consumer protections under state privacy law. The rules require businesses to disclose when AI is used in significant decisions, offer opt-out rights, and provide…
California Employers Beware – Mere Technical Violation Sufficient for Lawsuits
California employers can face lawsuits for even minor or “technical” violations of background check laws, especially under statutes like the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRAA) and related consumer reporting rules. Recent court decisions show that…
Companies Work to Navigate Operational, Legal Challenges Associated with AI In HR Systems
Companies are grappling with operational and legal challenges as they implement AI in HR systems. While AI tools can streamline hiring, performance management, and employee monitoring, they also raise concerns about bias, discrimination, and compliance with labor and…






