In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S.Ct. 1540 (2016) and Dyson v. Sky Chefs, Inc., 2017 WL 2618946 (N.D. Tex. June 16, 2017), it would be wise for employers to evaluate their Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) compliance. Businesses should update all FCRA documents and train managers and human resources professionals regarding background check processes. In Dyson, the court held that the plaintiff in a putative class action who alleged the improper inclusion of “extraneous” information in a FCRA disclosure lacked Article III standing.
Hiring Tips Blog
Plaintiffs Don’t Stand Tall in Texas FCRA Class Action
Aug 5, 2017 | Background Check Compliance, Fair Credit Reporting Act
Recent Posts
- Cleveland Will Prohibit Salary Inquiries and Require Salary Ranges in Job Postings
- Avoid EEOC Complaints
- The “Gold Standard”
- US Replaces ‘Noncitizen’ with ‘Alien’ in Employment Verification Form of Foreign Workers
- Trump’s Immigration Enforcement Against Employees Has Been Gradual. That May Soon Change.
Categories
- Background Check Compliance (99)
- Background Check Laws (58)
- Background Screening (39)
- Biometric Identification (2)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Credit Checks (32)
- Criminal History Check (176)
- Data Protection & Privacy (96)
- E-Verify Issues (74)
- Education Verification (7)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (48)
- Employer Negligence (36)
- Employment Screening (134)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (108)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (2)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (1)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (85)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (10)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (9)
- Occupational Fraud (10)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (182)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (19)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)