Neiman Marcus was found guilty of violating the Illinois Employee Credit Privacy Act when a conditional offer of employment for an entry level sales associate was rescinded after the store ran a credit check that revealed judgments against her. The store argued for three of the seven exceptions identified in the Act, focusing on the employee’s accessibility to personal and confidential information. Information, however, was too limited to justify the argument.
Hiring Tips Blog
Illinois Appellate Court Reminds Employers of Restrictions on Credit Checks
Nov 1, 2016 | Credit Checks, Data Protection & Privacy, Fair Credit Reporting Act
Recent Posts
- Older Workers Are Facing Tighter Identity Checks in Part-Time Jobs
- Securing Identity in a Digital Age: Why Advanced Verification Matters for the U.S.
- Congress Bans Delta-8 And THCA Under New Hemp Law
- Texas DPS Moving Forward with Expanding Cannabis Compassionate Use Program
- Up in Smoke: Should Businesses Still Drug Test for Marijuana?
Categories
- Artificial Intelligence Fraud (2)
- Background Check Compliance (106)
- Background Check Laws (65)
- Background Screening (51)
- Biometric Identification (8)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Credit Checks (32)
- Criminal History Check (190)
- Data Protection & Privacy (117)
- E-Verify Issues (80)
- Education Verification (9)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (52)
- Employer Negligence (37)
- Employment Screening (140)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (110)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (11)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (3)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (97)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (12)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (15)
- Occupational Fraud (22)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (196)
- Public Safety Hiring (1)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (22)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)