Over 100 states and cities across the United States have limited the use of an applicant’s criminal history in all but limited circumstances. Against this “ban the box” tsunami, some employers also have been attacked for not being aggressive enough in rejecting applicants based on their criminal backgrounds. The “Catch 22” has left some employers in doubt as to the course to take. Manufacturers will be well served to review their policies and practices accordingly.
Hiring Tips Blog
The Background Check Conundrum: “Manufacturing” a Problem (Pun Intended)
Oct 1, 2015 | Background Screening, Employment Screening
Recent Posts
- Identity Verification is Now a Hiring Must-Have
- Utah Department of Public Safety (DPS) Approves Bayometric’s Live Scan Fingerprinting System
- Hair Testing More Reliable for Detecting Illegal Drug Use, HHS Panel Told
- Up in Smoke: Should Businesses Still Drug Test for Marijuana?
- Marijuana’s Restrictive Federal Classification Isn’t Supported by Science, New Study Concludes
Categories
- Artificial Intelligence Fraud (6)
- Background Check Compliance (109)
- Background Check Laws (68)
- Background Screening (57)
- Biometric Identification (10)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2)
- Credit Checks (33)
- Criminal History Check (194)
- Data Protection & Privacy (131)
- E-Verify Issues (84)
- Education Verification (9)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (52)
- Employer Negligence (37)
- Employment Screening (144)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (111)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (13)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (3)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (99)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (12)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (15)
- Occupational Fraud (26)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (201)
- Public Safety Hiring (1)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (23)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)