Over 100 states and cities across the United States have limited the use of an applicant’s criminal history in all but limited circumstances. Against this “ban the box” tsunami, some employers also have been attacked for not being aggressive enough in rejecting applicants based on their criminal backgrounds. The “Catch 22” has left some employers in doubt as to the course to take. Manufacturers will be well served to review their policies and practices accordingly.
Hiring Tips Blog
The Background Check Conundrum: “Manufacturing” a Problem (Pun Intended)
Oct 1, 2015 | Background Screening, Employment Screening
Recent Posts
- Older Workers Are Facing Tighter Identity Checks in Part-Time Jobs
- Securing Identity in a Digital Age: Why Advanced Verification Matters for the U.S.
- Congress Bans Delta-8 And THCA Under New Hemp Law
- Texas DPS Moving Forward with Expanding Cannabis Compassionate Use Program
- Up in Smoke: Should Businesses Still Drug Test for Marijuana?
Categories
- Artificial Intelligence Fraud (2)
- Background Check Compliance (106)
- Background Check Laws (65)
- Background Screening (51)
- Biometric Identification (8)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Credit Checks (32)
- Criminal History Check (190)
- Data Protection & Privacy (117)
- E-Verify Issues (80)
- Education Verification (9)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (52)
- Employer Negligence (37)
- Employment Screening (140)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (110)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (11)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (3)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (97)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (12)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (15)
- Occupational Fraud (22)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (196)
- Public Safety Hiring (1)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (22)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)