A judge in Colorado has ruled that listing offenders’ personal information, such as names and addresses, gives the public the power to punish beyond what the court has deemed appropriate. He also ruled that the Colorado Sex Offender Registration Act violates the 14th Amendment process of rights. The judge has argued than an individual assessment should be considered for each case. The Attorney General’s Office could appeal the ruling to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Hiring Tips Blog

Federal Judge Rules State Sex Offender Registry is Unconstitutional
Oct 5, 2017 | Criminal History Check
Recent Posts
- Minnesota, Iowa Modify Employer Drug Testing Requirements
- Oral Fluid Tests Are Not Valid Indicators of Cannabis Exposure or Impairment
- THC Testing vs. Impairment: Legal Risks and Recent Employment Lawsuits
- Colorado Expands Reach of Obligations for Processing Biometric Identifiers and Biometric Data
- California Approves Rules Regulating AI in Employment Decision-making
Categories
- Background Check Compliance (103)
- Background Check Laws (59)
- Background Screening (44)
- Biometric Identification (5)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Credit Checks (32)
- Criminal History Check (182)
- Data Protection & Privacy (105)
- E-Verify Issues (76)
- Education Verification (7)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (49)
- Employer Negligence (37)
- Employment Screening (136)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (109)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (4)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (3)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (89)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (11)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (9)
- Occupational Fraud (13)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (189)
- Public Safety Hiring (1)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (20)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)