A judge in California dismissed a class action lawsuit by a driver against Lyft, Inc., after determining the employee could not demonstrate “concrete harm” as a result of the company’s background screening procedures. The ruling was similar to a recent case against the ride-sharing company, as well as one against Spokeo.
Hiring Tips Blog
Lyft Wins Background Check Class Action Claim
Nov 1, 2016 | Background Check Compliance
Recent Posts
- Cleveland Will Prohibit Salary Inquiries and Require Salary Ranges in Job Postings
- Avoid EEOC Complaints
- The “Gold Standard”
- US Replaces ‘Noncitizen’ with ‘Alien’ in Employment Verification Form of Foreign Workers
- Trump’s Immigration Enforcement Against Employees Has Been Gradual. That May Soon Change.
Categories
- Background Check Compliance (99)
- Background Check Laws (58)
- Background Screening (39)
- Biometric Identification (2)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Credit Checks (32)
- Criminal History Check (176)
- Data Protection & Privacy (96)
- E-Verify Issues (74)
- Education Verification (7)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (48)
- Employer Negligence (36)
- Employment Screening (134)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (108)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (2)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (1)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (85)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (10)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (9)
- Occupational Fraud (10)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (182)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (19)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)