A judge in California dismissed a class action lawsuit by a driver against Lyft, Inc., after determining the employee could not demonstrate “concrete harm” as a result of the company’s background screening procedures. The ruling was similar to a recent case against the ride-sharing company, as well as one against Spokeo.
Hiring Tips Blog
Lyft Wins Background Check Class Action Claim
Nov 1, 2016 | Background Check Compliance
Recent Posts
- I-9 Audits and Site Visits: How Construction Employers Can Prepare Before the Feds Come Knocking
- DOJ Accuses Illinois of Interfering with Federal Immigration Policy Via Workplace Privacy Law
- California Privacy Protection Agency Fines Retailer Over CCPA Violations
- Joyce, Jeffries Reintroduce Bipartisan Legislation to Prepare for Inevitable End to Federal Cannabis Prohibition
- Federal Judge in Pennsylvania Reverses Dismissal of Medical Marijuana Cardholder’s DisabilityDiscrimination Claim
Categories
- Background Check Compliance (100)
- Background Check Laws (59)
- Background Screening (41)
- Biometric Identification (2)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Credit Checks (32)
- Criminal History Check (177)
- Data Protection & Privacy (99)
- E-Verify Issues (74)
- Education Verification (7)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (48)
- Employer Negligence (36)
- Employment Screening (135)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (108)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (2)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (1)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (87)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (11)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (9)
- Occupational Fraud (11)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (184)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (19)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)