Background screening company LexisNexis recently was required to pay $375,000 in damages when a client was bought out by another company who used its services to screen current employees to determine hiring eligibility. LexisNexis failed to use the middle name of an employee, resulting in an incorrect criminal history and a refusal to hire. The employee went six weeks unpaid while trying to correct the error.
Hiring Tips Blog
A Middle Name – or Lack Thereof – Triggers FCRA Liability
Nov 1, 2016 | Fair Credit Reporting Act
Recent Posts
- Alertness and Impairment: New Study Reveals Impact of Fatigue, Alcohol and Cannabis
- AI Catches Up to California Employers: Regulations for Automated-Decision Systems Now in Effect
- Continuous Visa Vetting is Coming: What Employers Need to Know About Expanded Screening of Foreign Nationals
- EAD Revocation Guidance for E-Verify Employers
- How Employers Can Adapt to Immigration Policy Shifts
Categories
- Artificial Intelligence Fraud (2)
- Background Check Compliance (106)
- Background Check Laws (63)
- Background Screening (46)
- Biometric Identification (6)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Credit Checks (32)
- Criminal History Check (187)
- Data Protection & Privacy (113)
- E-Verify Issues (80)
- Education Verification (8)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (52)
- Employer Negligence (37)
- Employment Screening (137)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (110)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (9)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (3)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (96)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (11)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (11)
- Occupational Fraud (18)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (192)
- Public Safety Hiring (1)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (21)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)