Employers of all sizes may hire hundreds or thousands of employees every year, each of whom must properly complete a Form I-9 on time, as required by law. Organizations want to avoid the potentially crippling fines and penalties if a violation is discovered by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) auditors. Although complex to determine, “successor liability” can occur based upon the relationship of two companies, a violation for which ICE will seek to hold all parties accountable. One staffing company recently managed to escape such liability for a whopping $1.4 million fine for alleged I-9 violations. In U.S. v. Spectrum Technical Staffing Services and Personnel Plus, Inc., 12 OCAHO no. 1291 (Nov. 2016), a four-count complaint filed by ICE alleged Spectrum should be held liable for violations relating to the employment of unauthorized workers, as well as Form I-9 verification failures. ICE later amended the complaint to include a newly formed staffing company, Personnel Plus, Inc., that they felt was suspiciously created after the Notice of Inspection was served. After further investigation, the courts determined that ICE had failed to show any exceptions to the general rule that asset purchases are not liable as successors, nor could they provide evidence that any transfer had taken place. But that won’t stop ICE from examining future cases and trying again.
Hiring Tips Blog

Staffing Company Escapes Potential $1.4 Million Form I-9 Penalty
Jan 1, 2017 | E-Verify Issues, Immigration Issues
Recent Posts
- Checkr IDV Launches with Socure Biometrics to Counter Hiring Fraud
- What Will Marijuana’s Impending Reclassification to a Schedule III Drug Mean for Oklahoma Employers?
- Use of Medical Marijuana or Hemp Doesn’t Excuse Drug Testing Violations, Trump’s Transportation Department Warns
- Top Issues in the Cannabis Industry for 2026
- Companies Work to Navigate Operational, Legal Challenges Associated with AI In HR Systems
Categories
- Artificial Intelligence Fraud (8)
- Background Check Compliance (110)
- Background Check Laws (70)
- Background Screening (58)
- Biometric Identification (11)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2)
- Credit Checks (33)
- Criminal History Check (197)
- Data Protection & Privacy (135)
- E-Verify Issues (86)
- Education Verification (9)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (53)
- Employer Negligence (37)
- Employment Screening (147)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (112)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (12)
- Healthcare Hiring (13)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (3)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (101)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (12)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (17)
- Occupational Fraud (29)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (204)
- Public Safety Hiring (1)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (24)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)

