Background screening company LexisNexis recently was required to pay $375,000 in damages when a client was bought out by another company who used its services to screen current employees to determine hiring eligibility. LexisNexis failed to use the middle name of an employee, resulting in an incorrect criminal history and a refusal to hire. The employee went six weeks unpaid while trying to correct the error.
Hiring Tips Blog
A Middle Name – or Lack Thereof – Triggers FCRA Liability
Nov 1, 2016 | Fair Credit Reporting Act
Recent Posts
- Checkr IDV Launches with Socure Biometrics to Counter Hiring Fraud
- What Will Marijuana’s Impending Reclassification to a Schedule III Drug Mean for Oklahoma Employers?
- Use of Medical Marijuana or Hemp Doesn’t Excuse Drug Testing Violations, Trump’s Transportation Department Warns
- Top Issues in the Cannabis Industry for 2026
- Companies Work to Navigate Operational, Legal Challenges Associated with AI In HR Systems
Categories
- Artificial Intelligence Fraud (8)
- Background Check Compliance (110)
- Background Check Laws (70)
- Background Screening (58)
- Biometric Identification (11)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2)
- Credit Checks (33)
- Criminal History Check (197)
- Data Protection & Privacy (135)
- E-Verify Issues (86)
- Education Verification (9)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (53)
- Employer Negligence (37)
- Employment Screening (147)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (112)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (12)
- Healthcare Hiring (13)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (3)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (101)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (12)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (17)
- Occupational Fraud (29)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (204)
- Public Safety Hiring (1)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (24)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)