The District Court for the Central District of California found in favor of consumer standing in the case of Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins. A similar case, Rodriquez v. El Toro Investors Ltd., is focused on an alleged violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. In this case, the court also found that the defendant had Constitutional standing, stating that El Toro provided an improper disclosure during the background screening process.
Hiring Tips Blog
Receipt of Improper Background Check Disclosure is Sufficient to Confer Standing Under Spokeo
Dec 1, 2016 | Background Check Compliance, Credit Checks, Fair Credit Reporting Act
Recent Posts
- Minnesota, Iowa Modify Employer Drug Testing Requirements
- Oral Fluid Tests Are Not Valid Indicators of Cannabis Exposure or Impairment
- THC Testing vs. Impairment: Legal Risks and Recent Employment Lawsuits
- Colorado Expands Reach of Obligations for Processing Biometric Identifiers and Biometric Data
- California Approves Rules Regulating AI in Employment Decision-making
Categories
- Background Check Compliance (103)
- Background Check Laws (59)
- Background Screening (44)
- Biometric Identification (5)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Credit Checks (32)
- Criminal History Check (182)
- Data Protection & Privacy (105)
- E-Verify Issues (76)
- Education Verification (7)
- Educational and Childcare Hiring (28)
- EEOC (49)
- Employer Negligence (37)
- Employment Screening (136)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (109)
- Featured Posts (1)
- Financial Services Hiring (11)
- Healthcare Hiring (4)
- Hiring Legal Compliance (3)
- Home Services and Repairs Hiring (6)
- Human Resources & Benefits (26)
- Immigration Issues (89)
- IT and Data Security Hiring (11)
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Industry Hiring (9)
- Occupational Fraud (13)
- Pre-employment Drug Testing (189)
- Public Safety Hiring (1)
- Retail Hiring (14)
- Security Services Hiring (3)
- Social Media (32)
- Transportation Industry Hiring (20)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Wage History Checks (4)